San Francisco can’t issue its own rules regulating how much radiation a
cell phone emits, the CITA argues, so it shouldn’t be allowed to force
retailers to supply additional notice on the subject beyond what the FCC
requires, either.
The CTIA is so up in arms about the issue that
it has even pulled its annual trade show from San Francisco, slapping
the town in the face with a financial attack that could ultimately have
much more serious ramifications than its lawsuit. (Starting in 2011, the
fall show will move to San Diego.)
How will this end up? The law
is far from clear on whether a city can legally require notices like
this, although there are some vague precedents and analogues — such as
the requirement that health inspections be publicly posted in
restaurants — that indicate it may have the right to make this mandate.
On the other hand, the FCC is notoriously touchy about other agencies
and municipalities treading on its turf, so it may very well issue rules
protecting its domain. That said, the FCC has been mum on this issue so
far.
Ultimately, Ars Technica hits it on the head about what the
“electronic boycott” and legal action are really all intended to do:
not so much to overturn the law on San Francisco, per se, but rather to
scare the bejeezus out of any other city that’s considering the same
kind of thing.
Take that.
